Latest writings...

Subscribe to the RSS Feed

My Son’s Thought-Provoking New Memoir

Posted on 07 November 2025 (0)

MY RIDE THROUGH LIFE: A Cambridge Kid Finds Identity in Dirt Lots, City Schools, and Reggae Beats

Here’s what people are saying about it:

“This memoir taps into universal experiences using candid storytelling. It’s about growing up, uncertainty, struggle, love, pain, joy, and everything in between.  It brought back flashes of my childhood. Beckwith artfully weaves his contemplations, journal entries, and poetry with lyrical inspiration.”
– Meta Partenheimer, Cambridge Historical Commission

As soon as I got it, and I found it hard to put down. It’s just so delightful, warm and honest. I hope many folks get to immerse themselves in the exploits and insights that you experienced and expressed.”
– Susan S., licensed therapist

My Ride Through Life is a compelling coming-of-age story told with humor and compassion. What grabs the reader is the author’s struggle to find himself, along with the questions he raises—questions that many of have also faced.”
– Susan Pollack, journalist and author, Gloucester Fisherman’s Wives Cookbook



MY RIDE THROUGH LIFE: A Cambridge Kid Finds Identity in Dirt Lots, City Schools, and Reggae Beats

 

On Learning to Care: Personal Essays on One Couple’s Alzheimer’s Experience

Posted on 03 November 2025 (0)

My husband Jon, a molecular biologist and social activist in science, was 85 years old when in 2020, we received his diagnosis of early Alzheimer’s disease.

Since then, I‘ve been writing about our experience, as I seek perspective on it.

I wrote these personal essays in the hopes that they will be shared widely.

Sincerely,

Barbara Beckwith (June 2025)

beckwithb@aol.com

 

On Learning to Care

Personal Essays on one couple’s Alzheimer’s Experience

  1. On Learning to Care
  2. We Were in it Together – Until We Weren’t
  3. I Made Every Mistake – Tho I Knew Better
  4. Learning to Converse with My Husband
  5. Still Jon
  6. Visitor to My Husband’s Life
  7. How Do I “do” this Last Stage of Our Lives Together?

 

On Learning to Care

Recently, at my local theater, I was mesmerized by the solo performer’s portrayal of 12 different characters. Mid-play, however, a white-haired couple seated close to the stage started talking in low but agitated murmurs. I was annoyed, and worried that the actor might lose concentration, especially when the couple made a commotion as they rose and left for what I assumed was an urgent restroom need.

When they returned, the man’s halting gait, anxious questions about where to sit, kept irritating me, until it dawned on me that what seemed like rude behavior was most likely cognitive confusion. 

I grew up unacquainted with old people: my grandparents died before I got to know them. Our suburban neighborhood was populated by nuclear families, only one of which included a grandparent. Back then, any elderly person who became “out of it” disappeared into an “old age home,” and it was considered impolite to inquire about their wellbeing, much less to visit them. 

But now, as members of my own family are experiencing mild or significant cognitive decline, I am belatedly feeling deep chagrin at the demeaning ways that, over the years, I have viewed people living with memory disorders.

One such view was that a sure way to amuse friends was by telling “ditzy old folks” stories, especially the one about my husband’s grandmother, who would repeatedly ask “Want some more salt?” as she poured it on a family member’s soup or sandwich. 

I’ve also taken cognitive impairment as an affront, as when an older woman I visited often started to imagine that her nephew was stealing from her. Her suspicion persisted, despite assurances that he couldn’t have done so because he’d moved to Florida. She “knew” he must have an accomplice. When she demanded that we agree, I stopped visiting, valuing “the truth” over empathy for her fear and distress.

I was so oblivious, in fact, that I was unable to recognize the varied ways dementia can show up. After a colleague invited me to visit with her parents, one of whom I’d heard had Alzheimer’s, I spent time with the couple but mistook the quiet man to be the one experiencing the disease, not the garrulous woman.

And I was taken aback when a neighbor saw people who weren’t there, and imagined terrifying scenarios. When her husband asked if I’d stay with her one afternoon a week to give him a break, I demurred, unable to appreciate that her unstoppable worry about “children in danger,” came out of her life-long caring for young people, as a parent and teacher.

Looking back, I now see that at the core of my regretful behavior toward people with cognitive decline was my own feeling of discomfort, fed by ignorance.  

Now that the condition has hit close to home, and I have become a caregiver, I am eager to learn from those who are willing to share their experience, ignoring the disease’s persistent stigma. 

My eyes were opened by Richard Taylor, author of Alzheimer’s From the Inside Out, who is both frank about his progressive cognitive loss and clear about his continued self-worth. My heart is touched by Olivia Ames Hoblitzelle who with her husband Hob shared their experience in Ten Thousand Joys and Ten Thousand Sorrows: A Couple’s Journey through Alzheimer’s. I admire the decision of Harvard Law School professor Charles J. Ogletree Jr., who a year after being diagnosed at 62 with advanced Alzheimer’s, went public in order to raise awareness of the brain disorder, especially since he knew how African Americans like him are often diagnosed too late to benefit from mitigating medications. 

Now, when I see an older couple and notice that one is being gently kept from crossing a street with a flashing “do not walk” sign, or steered away from putting groceries in the wrong cart, or who is holding up the line at a store while attempting, to no avail, to give the cashier the right combination of coins, or whose agitation is disrupting a theater performance, I find myself settling into calm patience, as my heart goes out to the cared-for and their caregivers.

 

We Were in it Together–Until We Weren’t

We’ve always done things together, my husband and I. We fell in love in college, married and raised two sons, biked and hiked, cooked and danced, shared our disparate views and careers, he as a scientist, I as a writer. We learned together how to argue successfully, how to be okay with each other’s backseat driving, from shouts of “slow down, it’s icy!” to “watch out! – the truck on your left is cutting you off!” 

Our togetherness has changed since Alzheimer’s entered our lives. For a while, though we were told he had “mild cognitive impairment,” and even when it shifted to “early Alzheimer’s,” we remained a team. 

For more than a year, we together managed his meds, paid our bills, struggled to complete our taxes. We made socializing with friends a joint challenge: he’d start a story, and I’d supply the name of a French town, favorite film, old friend, justice issue, book title, historical fact.

As his condition changed, I resorted more and more to “20 Questions” guessing, as we both struggled to find the word he was searching for, what story from our joint past “we” could tell.

During the three years that my husband remained at home, “we” shifted to those of us who cared for him. Family members who took over the finances. Friends who offered soups and casseroles, when shopping with him became too difficult for me. Hired “companions” who I greeted with tears, grateful for the caregiving time off they gave me. Neighborhood pre-teens who listened and responded with respect when he talked to them – about what they could only guess.

Before my husband had to move to a memory care facility, we “care partners” had to confer with each other behind closed doors over how to deal with multiplying crises, which in turn created new problems. He noticed and grew suspicious, accusing us of not telling him what was going on.

And he was right: we were not telling him what was going on. As we were becoming close as a team, my husband seemed to me to be drifting away from his former self.

At each neurology appointment, when asked how he felt, he’d say he felt fine. Then I’d be pulled aside and asked – how is he really? And how was I? Was I safe?

Was I safe? Depends on your definition. He often became frustrated. He thought I’d hidden his wallet, his hat, his glasses. He would imagine projects that didn’t exist and accuse me of not helping him achieve them. He would throw around papers or books, and bang on the table or wall in anger.

Even though I knew it was the disease that was making him angry, I initially over-reacted. I found myself responding as if to a domineering man. If he yelled, I would shut myself off in another room and shout: “Don’t you get violent, or I will call the police!”

My threats didn’t work, and anyway, he didn’t hit me. What calmed him would be an apology from me for hiding his hat, taking his wallet, or blocking his project – whatever he thought I’d done. I could then shift from being his adversary to being his collaborator: “Let’s look together– I’m sure we can find it.” 

My friends told me I was doing a great job taking care of him. But my need to be constantly on alert, ready to respond to confusions, accusations and outbursts – plus the lying I had to do, got to me. I resorted to pacing our apartment or roaming the neighborhood streets, babbling, “I’m a good person, I’m a good person.” I started seeing a therapist to better understand what was happening, and to keep myself under control.

Now, four years later, I regularly spend time with my husband in his memory care place; it’s within walking distance of where we lived together for 50 years. In his new home, we don’t need to argue over where he misplaced something. He can tell me which staff or residents he likes and which he imagines have taken his belongings, or are trying to kill him. I now know to respond with a sympathetic “hmm.” 

We go to live jazz performances, join in on folk song singalongs. We look at photo albums, listen to music, hold hands, dance a bit, embrace a lot. 

We’re together again.

 

I Made Every Mistake, Tho I Knew Better

Until my husband was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s, I was ignorant of – even indifferent to – the debilitating condition that had already begun to affect our lives. I’m of a generation that assumed that older people exhibiting confusion and memory loss needed to be put somewhere – out of sight and out of mind.

Even now, despite educating myself by reading dozens of books by medical experts, caregivers and people experiencing the disease, as well as by joining an advice-sharing support group, I’ve made every caregiver mistake.

Why has it taken me so long to absorb what I was reading and hearing? 

When my husband and I got his diagnosis, at first of “mild cognitive decline,” we pondered together when “it” might have started. Was it when he stopped doing the New York Times crossword puzzle? When he sat in on the classes he once taught and realized he couldn’t follow the discussion? Or when he didn’t remember his grandsons’ names? When he had two car accidents that he was sure weren’t his fault?

We thought we were coping. We figured out mnemonics to solve the grandson-naming problem. He took pills to slow the disease’s advance. I learned what’s involved in bill paying, furnace upkeep, cable TV streaming. We joked about writing our own obituaries; after all, we were both in our 80s.

But my husband became increasingly frustrated: “I don’t know what’s going on. How do I figure my age? I can’t understand calendars. I can’t even talk – my brain.” Although I tried to reassure him, his frustration increased. If I told him that his shoes were on the wrong foot, or that he’d set the heat for 85, he’d tell me “I never did that,” and accuse me of disrespect. 

By this time, I’d learned the Alzheimer’s Association mantra, “You can’t change a person with dementia: you can only change yourself.” Yet I hung onto how, during 65 years of marriage, we’d learned to openly argue, explain, concede, and apologize, not go to bed mad. So now I proclaimed: “We’re having a communication problem: you say I wasn’t being respectful, and I feel you weren’t being respectful. Let’s agree: I’ll say I’m sorry, if you’ll say you’re sorry.” My even-handed reconciliation idea failed. His anger persisted, I backed down, but along with relief, I felt personally humiliated.

Any raised voice or insistent tone, even in a moment of urgency (“Don’t cross the street yet – cars are coming!” “You can’t go out to the lab – it’s nighttime!”) he’d see as abusive yelling. When he vociferously refused to take his pills (“The blue one will kill me!”) I would panic and respond at the same decibel level, which backfired. More I’m sorrys. My caregiver support group eventually urged me to add his pills, crushed, to ice cream, or to just back off and try again later.

Gradually, he started losing his awareness of social norms. When friends would visit, he’d interrupt them to say whatever was on his mind. Again, I took his behavior personally, as if it reflected badly on both of us. 

He would talk to strangers, children, and even couples in deep conversation. He’d approach tall white-haired men, assuming they were colleagues with whom to swap research projects. I’d make a “no need to respond” gesture from behind my husband’s back, then feel shame for doing so.

Just as the disease was degrading his ability to feel what was going on with others, I was losing my empathy toward him, privately blaming his “rudeness” on his being a man. I kept focusing on my sense of what was right. Changing myself for his sake would not be easy.

A year ago, I moved my husband to a memory care facility, where my “quality of life” hopes for him rose. Another mistake: I wanted for him not just safety and care, but everything I’d wish for myself: lots of new people, constant stimulating conversations, fresh insights.

I was hampered by my image of a good life, ignoring his individuality. We’d always differed, in large and small ways. His mind had been elegantly analytical – mine loose and creative. Nevertheless, we’d always bonded over music, activism, and mountain flora, especially alpine flowers — though he loved their colors, I, their shapes.

In memory care, I’d urge him to “do stuff” – walk, sing, try unfamiliar games. “Don’t push me,” he’d say, crossly, sometimes flailing his arms in anger. And he was right. By now, I should be using the gentler Alzheimer’s-specific persuasion strategies I’d read about.

I started to take cues from the memory care staff and the aides. I saw them always greeting him by name, softly deflecting his anger, “redirecting” him if, at the end of a visit, he resists my departure. Before removing his jacket or shoes, they respected his need to be asked. Observing his dislike of commotion, they sat him at meals after everyone else was seated.  They honored his right to say no to activities, to a meal or to jacket-removal, having learned that asking again later would usually get a yes.

Gradually, as I’ve been refraining from pushing my husband, I’m opening my eyes to where he finds pleasure. Hanging out in the park or lobby to people-watch. Foot-tapping to his favorite music. Lounging on the couch as I rub his head (“mmm” he murmurs). Strolling in the garden to enjoy the trees, birds, an occasional rabbit, and flowers of all kinds.

Our life together may have changed dramatically, but we both can savor those flowers — I, their shapes, he, their colors, each in our own way.

 

Learning to Converse with My Husband

I’ve often had to change my conversational style to better communicate when traveling abroad: to use vigorous gestures in Italy, tone these down in England, roll my r’s in Mexico, soften them in Greece, smile in Japan, refrain from smiling in France.

So I should be able to adapt as I learn the new language I now need to converse with my husband when I visit him in his memory care facility.

Yet I’m discovering that each person experiencing Alzheimer’s has his or her particular way of communicating.

My husband was a professor, and still speaks like one. “This organization is problematic.” “What’s the status?” “It’s not relevant.” 

People he talks to may assume from his reasoned tone of voice, and his perfect sentence structure, that they should understand what he’s saying. I often have to indicate, with hidden gestures, that they ought not to ask for clarification. Because clarification doesn’t work.

What my husband is talking about often eludes even me. Yet he clearly has topics he wants to discuss, from what he’s experiencing, people he likes or dislikes, events he says took place high up and near water, to worries about children he imagines being endangered.

I mostly listen and sympathize. The challenge comes when he asks me if I did that, was there, knew that. I’ve had to become proficient at being unsure, murmuring “maybe, a little, I’m not sure.”

I’ve given up telling multi-faceted stories: I now pare them down to short chunks. And I no longer think he’s rude when he interrupts me to say what’s on his mind. It’s just the way his mind now works. 

I’ve also picked up conversation tips from other visitors to memory care residents. “I like your blue cardigan,” one visitor said to a silent group of women. Doing so made the woman feel seen and heard: she spoke up, sharing where she bought her garment and what she likes about it, inspiring the others to join in and do the same.

I am cheered when my husband shows delight or insight – an occasional “This place is great!” or “Living takes time!” 

But when he gets upset: “I’m not functioning. I can’t read, I can’t write, I can’t do anything!”, my role is more challenging. I’m discovering that raising my voice to reassure him doesn’t work. I now try to stay calm when he takes offense at something I’ve said, often admonishing me to “Be more careful in your wording” as if I’m a grad student in need of mentoring. I no longer feel hurt by his occasional “I don’t trust you!” outbursts. Instead, I say I’m sorry, folding my arms against my heart to show I care, which reassures him more than words can do.

I am comforted by the words of Alzheimer’s counselor Dasha Kiper, who writes: “All conversation is, in a sense, hopeful.” She’s referring to Samuel Beckett’s nonsensical dialogue in his play Waiting for Godot, and to conversations with people experiencing Alzheimer’s. I try to remember her reassuring perspective: “By conversing we create and acknowledge the possibility that clarity, meaning, and connection exist even when there appears to be only strangeness and futility.”

So my husband and I continue to converse, as long as it’s possible.  

And when verbal conversation is no longer possible, I’ll lean my head on my husband’s shoulder, my hand gently circling his head, using a way of communicating that we have always known and shared, that can speak my affection as clearly as words once did.

 

Still Jon

Over the last few years, I’ve heard — or overheard — people refer to residents of my husband’s memory care facility in ways I can’t relate to. 

A devoted wife calls her Alzheimer’s affected husband “brain dead.” A dedicated paid companion says of his charge that “you just have to treat her like a three-year-old.” After a live jazz performance, I overhear the pianist joke to his bass player about “another day playing for zombies.” A friend says her former partner is simply “not there.”

 

Each such remark hurts, because to me, even five years into his Alzheimer’s diagnosis, my husband Jon is still absolutely the man I fell in love with and still love. His preoccupations remain those of the provider he once was: “where’s my wallet, I need it,” “children are in danger,” or, when I propose a walk, “I don’t think we paid for it.” He persists in needing to be in charge: If I try to help with his peeling of a banana or orange, he reprimands me: “We have to decide on the order.” 

 

He is curious: “Who are you?” he asks new people (and sometimes me). When he watches me write (his memoir is in the facility’s library), he wants to know “How do you get those words?” Noticing a new red towel, he asks, with professorial seriousness, “but what does it mean?” He searches, as he did as a microbiologist, for significance.

 

I admire how his observations and concerns manage to get through his brain’s “tau tangle” and “amyloid plaque” obstructions, like deer weaving through dense foliage. Although I rarely understand what he’s referring to, I respond with “yes” or a “hmm” so that he knows I’m interested. Which I am: each fragment fascinates me.

 

We attend his facility’s live music events. At folk singalongs, we join in with the guitarists, singing “Oh Susannah” or “This Land is Your Land.” When the jazz trio (Jon has been a jazz afficionado) finishes a piece, we clap along with others. Some may have seemed to be comatose (“zombies”) yet open their eyes and raise their hands to join the applause. Music reaches even those who no longer talk or walk.

 

Most of the time, Jon wants me to sit with him and rub his head, as I’ve done all our married life. As my hand circles his brain, I let my thoughts float free, bringing to mind those Tibetan meditation bowls’ resonant hum, which starts with a rub around its rim and keeps vibrating, needing no further stirring.

Meanwhile, I am aware that friends and family are busy racing through life, as Jon and I once did, pursuing as many experiences as can fit in a day, rarely pausing to fully feel each moment, which we now do. The sensations Jon and I share now are good enough. Just being with him is exactly where I want to be.

Yes, Jon is now in hospice, and yes, he’s getting weaker, quieter, more confused. But he’s not a three-year-old. He’s not brain dead or a zombie. To me, he’s whole, beloved, still here.

 

Visitor to My Husband’s Life

When I moved my husband into a memory care facility, I felt that I should leave the support group I’d been part of for the past five years, where people shared challenges they faced as they cared for Alzheimer’s-affected loved ones at home.

I no longer face those particular challenges: I now spend just hours with the man I’ve shared my life with since the 1960s. I pour myself into each hour, often leaving “his place” exhausted in body and mind.

Yet memory care aides are now the ones ensuring that he gets dressed, showered, fed – and kept safe, which I’d finally become unable to do. I visit my husband’s life, but they’re in charge of taking him to exercise, music and social events. And if he prefers to stay in his bedroom, they’re responsible for checking on him every 15 minutes, and dealing with whatever stuff comes up.

And stuff does keep coming up.

In the first months, he awoke at night and wandered the halls and community room. Only after the night shift offered him a midnight snack and conversation, could he be persuaded to return to his room. 

Some weeks later, he panicked while being showered: two aides were now needed to handle that necessary job, so fierce was his get-away-from-me grip. He thrashed out in alarm, as well, at the barber and podiatrist, despite the calming techniques they sought to apply.

I brought in clippers to trim his toes, his old-fashioned razor to help him shave, and scissors to keep his beard under control, staying constantly alert for sudden moves that might cause me to cut the man I love.  

Although his closet held familiar clothes, when aides pulled even a favorite t-shirt over his head, he reacted with fear at briefly being unable to see. I stashed those shirts and replaced them with ones he could button himself, albeit unevenly — which I learned to let be.

When shoelaces became a problem, I bought him slip-ons. When I saw that he liked to slip them off right after they’d been slipped on, I let that be as well.

Later, his hats, CDs and photo albums started to turn up outside his room. At first I blamed the staff for losing them, but eventually it became clear that my husband liked to leave his belongings in the “living room” – or in the rooms of residents who kept open the doors to their bedrooms.

Yes, he enjoyed the photo album I made for him, but he also enjoyed ripping out its plastic-protected photo pages — what drove him to do this I couldn’t discern. I found an album that was more difficult to destroy, although I couldn’t save the large poster of himself that he tore down – the cover of his memoir.

With help from a son who’d just retired, I spent much of my non-visit life conferring with my spouse’s doctor, memory care director, facility nurse, while also scheduling visits by friends and colleagues, all of us trying hard to provide him with “quality of life.”

Half of our quality-of-life ideas failed. The “simple” CD player had a glitch: if you forgot to hit the off button, the music continued to spin, wearing down the machine. The granola bars we brought seemed like a good healthy snack idea until we saw one that had fallen behind his bureau, attracting ants.

During my visits, I’d intend to just “be” with my husband but instead would find myself scanning the room for missing eyeglasses or stray slip-ons, or thinking about how I might get him to go to the garden, see a live music performance, drive in the car, or walk around the park. When I took daily walks to “clear my mind,” they’d get cluttered up by problem-solving rumination.  

Back in the house we shared for 50 years, each room is a reminder of our decades together. Their shelves of books conjure up ideas, passions and causes we shared, as well as those we didn’t, which often led to our deepest conversations. 

Our rooms hold old letters, as well, that recall what attracted us to each other. I never did understand his scientific research and he didn’t always connect with my teaching or my writing. Yet he once wrote me from a scientific conference in Paris: “I hate myself for not having you here. I’m missing something when you are not appreciating things, even things I don’t like.” 

Like my husband’s experience with esoteric science, his experience now with Alzheimer’s remains a mystery to me, a mystery I can “let be.” After all, no matter how close I may feel to friends, neighbors, colleagues, and even family, I also know that we are all only partially knowable to each other, all visitors to each other’s lives. 

So I will stay in my Alzheimer’s support group, because yes, I am still a part, at least, of my husband’s life, and he will always be a part of mine.

 

How Do I “do” This Last Stage of Our Lives Together?

My husband Jon is now getting hospice care, based on medical experts’ assessment in January that he will die from “complications of Alzheimer’s disease” within six months. It’s now July and he is still with me.

I study how people with Alzheimer’s may go: via pneumonia, a fall, a heart attack, or refusing food and water.  I know the six months prediction is not set in stone, but I visit Jon every day, just in case.

He now spends his days in a movable Broda bed-chair, since his brain and legs no longer coordinate well enough to allow him to walk. When meals are served, he sometimes feeds himself; sometimes he is fed. He shares what’s on his mind, often in indiscernible sentences but sometimes in clear declarations. “Let’s go” after an hour outside in the sunny garden. “It’s freezing!”  on returning to air-conditioning. 

Memory care aides take good care of him, and a hospice “friend” visits twice a week to hold his hand and respond to whatever he says. Hospice also provides a nurse, a social worker, and any needed equipment. I’m offered a spiritual advisor, which I decline: my family, friends, therapist, and caregiver support zoom, suffice. 

Two memory care residents also “in hospice” died recently, so I realize that any day could be his last. I feel a deep need to spend time with him physically, not as the lovers we were for the past 60 years, just as skin-to-skin intimates. Most of the time I simply stroke his arms, chest, legs, beard, and ask, with his permission, for a kiss.

Meanwhile, I feel suspended in time, knowing this final stage’s duration is not set in stone. I find myself scanning my newspapers for obituaries that mention Alzheimer’s as cause of death, and wonder if “complications of pneumonia” or “died after a long illness”  were meant to avoid naming the disease that’s now pervasive.

One in three of us who reach 85 will experience it.

Oddly, Jon being in hospice is leading me to contemplate my own eventual demise. After all, I’ve surpassed my mother’s 69 years, and may possibly surpass my father’s 98, now just 10 years away. I don’t picture myself living any further.

As I focus on moving my husband’s books and papers to archives honoring his science and social justice activism, and giving our sons his record collection to sell, I’m beginning to pare down and give away my own stuff.

And when I visit my local cemetery, I’m aware that I’m deciding where our joint cremains will go. I look at 21st century gravestones for inscription ideas. Neither of us would want old fashioned “dearly beloved.” Instead, maybe something like “onward!” as a friend’s stone declares. 

As for choosing the wording, I am conflicted about whether to use my husband’s full name or simply “Jon” as everyone knows him by. Which raises the core existential question: who cares? The next generations of our family? Friends and colleagues? Future historians? Amateur genealogists? My inscription decision remains on hold. 

I do line up a funeral parlor to handle “transport” when the time comes. And I choose a memorial venue, already worried about whether I can stave off tears.

As for Jon’s obituary, when I attempt to draft one, I find myself unable to proceed. I can’t bear to write in the past tense as long as he is still belovedly present. 

Instead, I play with writing one for myself. I’d like it to start something like this: “Barbara Beckwith died at age 99 after a fall on ice while walking to her neighborhood café for her morning croissant and coffee.” The rest I’ll leave to family to write “when the time comes.”

As I struggle with accepting Jon’ s eventual demise, I’m at least becoming comfortable with my own.

 

When my mother was 67, she lost her voice forever

Posted on 10 May 2021 (0)

When my mother was 67, she lost her voice forever – or did she?

My mother valued conversation. She loved getting people together to share perspectives on anything from the existence of God, to the ideas of George Bernard Shaw, to whether it was okay to kill of animals for food or sport.

Back when I was a teenager, she’d get me and my friends talking about social problems, about world politics, or about her favorite subject: moral dilemmas. She’d listen intently to whatever we said, and we loved it: we’d never been taken so seriously before.

When my sisters and I had children of our own, she took as much interest in them as she had in us. And they responded by wondering with her, about how sunsets are made, why people get sick, where insects go at night, and why rain can’t be stopped by waving a stick.

So when she was diagnosed with throat cancer and told that to slow its growth, her larynx must be removed, she faced the end of her preferred way of being with family and friends: in conversation.

At first, Mom wrote down whatever she wanted to say, on one of those “magic slates” that come with a plastic page to write on, lift to erase and then reuse. She found a Sesame Street one with Cookie Monster munching two cookies at once, their crumbs tumbling down the slate’s margins.

Young children liked the Cookie Monster, but they couldn’t read her words. And her conversation with adults was slowed to a boring pace by the write-and-read process.  So at the urging of her doctor, she tried to master “esophageal speech,” achieved by swallowing and trapping air in the esophagus and forcing it out in a kind of burp that allows her words to come out and be heard.

Encouraged by her speech therapist, a charming Italian doctor who reminded her of her old Italian boyfriend, she gave it her best shot. But she couldn’t learn it well enough to do much more than swear, her frustration salved by her doctor admitting that he’d tried it himself and largely failed.

Yet she never lost her sense of humor.

I lived far away and wasn’t with her for most of her ordeal, but we exchanged letters weekly. During one  hospital stay, she wrote: “I really don’t care what they take out – but if it’s my brain, I insist on all or none.” And  then “The doctor’s been and gone, and there are to be also an epidemic of students. I do wish I had more elegant underwear.” As well as “I’m going to end up in a text book – whatever else they say about me I hope they mention the red hair.”

From rehab, she wrote, “I’ve been trying esophageal speech for days, saying short phrases. I’m absolutely hopeless. I handed Dr. S. a note saying I could get no sounds but hisses, wheezes and gulps for two days.  I swore at myself, banged tables, stamped feet, then gave it one more try – and said every damn one!”

Her frustration was obvious: “God damn it, I terribly miss having conversations! I have no great motherly things to say, just long for the joy of exchanging fresh ideas to consider questions beyond mine.”

So she tried using an artificial larynx, a battery-powered device that when placed against her throat, emitted vibrations that “powered ” her speech in place of her missing larynx. Once she got the hang of it, she was able to produce clear sounds.

“I had an hour and a half conversation with Dr. S – I was manic, so happy after being dumb, in terms of exchanging thoughts and ideas, for the last six months.”

But her artificial larynx lacked an essential element: intonation. Often when she called a store or office, people would hang up on her, assuming that what sounded to them like squawking was just a joke.  She wrote that “Just a few people understand me on the phone – and they are great guessers. My great thrill was when the bank VP understood me: before he confessed that his father used an artificial larynx, I was about to ask if I could adopt him.”

Her mechanical voice took getting used to even for family and friends. She wrote me that when she tried to use her new gadget to call her son-in-law, “He heard my little Minnie Mouse voice and got hysterical. ‘Marian: is your house on fire? Are you sick? Shall I come up right away?’ I squeaked back, ‘No No No goodbye.’”

Mom found ways to connect with kids who visited: she’d doodle on the piano, playing familiar songs like “Mary Had a Little Lamb,” switching to a gloomy-sounding minor key and back to the cheerful one. She’d let kids ring the large loud cowbell, which she kept in case she needed to calling for help. And her clever quips helped: kids would stop staring and laugh along with her.

But not always. She wrote me that “My six-year-old friend Hank came over to visit, and I yanked out my speaker and said ‘Hi, Hank.’ He looked surprised, stared at me, and said, ‘Oh, last night I dreamed you could talk.’ I said, ‘I dreamed that once too.’  ‘Oh,” he said, ‘I guess I’d better go now.’ I did cry for a moment after he left because he had such a nice dream and wanted to find out if it was true. Is it healthier to be angry, or to cry a bit? I guess a bit of each.”

And yet she never indulged in self-pity, and fought our worry, as well. “I told Dr. di Simone that next time one of my bossy sisters calls, to tell your office to say, “Dr. Di Simone is busy with Mrs. Shutt, in Autopsy.”

She didn’t have long to live, but she stayed open-eyed and interested, engaged in conversation with each moment of life that remained. And her wit never deserted her. As she wrote me in one letter: “I wish people would stop praying for me, lighting candles, kissing me solemnly on the forehead as if I were a station of the cross in a Catholic church. I don’t mean to be ungrateful – I’ve just opted to enjoy each day – and all the absurdities of my experiences.”

Erased

Posted on 10 January 2021 (0)

Every day, I get glimpses of the erasure of Americans of color. My May 8 New York Times arts section (“For a Great Escape, Try a 1940s Musical”) describes the era when white movie stars like Fred Astaire and Shirley Temple danced in blackface to tap and jazz, trained by African American dancers, allowed to appear in Hollywood films only in stand-alone scenes that could be cut out when the films were shown in the South.

In the same issue, I learn of another erased American of color, Thomas McKeller, the elevator operator whose “tautly muscled body” was sketched in charcoal by John Singer Sargent, serving as the basis of the artist’s gods and heroes murals, his model’s African American facial features replaced by “classic” Greek and Roman features, hair and skin.

The very next day, the Times runs “A Killing Sheds Light on the Fear of ‘Running While Black,” about Black joggers who call out greetings or flash smiles to white passersby, so as not to be feared, knowing their individuality is unlikely to be seen. As one runner puts it: “I don’t know who taught me that, but I know it’s required, and that’s really sad.”

Three days later, the Boston Globe reports that due to the COVID19 pandemic, Boston officials have finally (but temporarily) dropped the entrance exam to their three prestigious public high schools, a test based not on what is covered in Boston lower schools, but rather on what’s covered in private (“independent”) lower schools. Another erasure, this time of black and brown youth, who are, largely for this reason, less likely to glean entrance to Boston’s “exam schools.”

The next day, I see a public TV documentary on Asian American history, including how Chinese laborers who built much of our country’s first transcontinental railway were excluded from the famous 1869 photograph of the final “Golden Spike,” joining East and West coast tracks, just as during and after World War II, the more than 1 million Black soldiers were left out of World War II news broadcasts lauding “American soldiers’” bravery. Decades later, the Department of Defense commissions a documentary about Black soldiers’ WW II contributions, but nixes Black filmmaker William H. Smith’s inclusion of soldiers’ frank accounts of racism. That full reality can finally be seen, thanks to Smith’s independently produced “The Invisible Soldiers – Unheard Voices.” Perhaps this explains the recent comment of Drew Bees, the white Saints quarterback  who claimed that “taking the knee” dishonors his grandfathers’ service, ignoring the  Black soldiers who served, as well.

And now, because of the global visibility of the excruciating near 9-minute knee-on-neck murder of George Floyd, what’s been invisible, especially to whites like me, has been revealed. We are finally seeing and feeling our country’s intransigent, institutionalized, inhumane and intolerable racial inequity. As writers, we can all be part of uncovering what’s hidden, to insure that people of color, now and in the past, are no longer erased.

The Talking Drum

Posted on 21 July 2020 (0)

Lisa Braxton’s debut novel, The Talking Drum (INNANA, a Canadian feminist press, 2020), is remarkably timely. Set in fictional “Bellport, Massachusetts,” in the 1970s, it dovetails with Boston’s Black residents’ current struggle to keep Boston’s Nubian Square alive and flourishing, as well as the gentrification of the South End long ago, and Boston’s now very white Seaport.

Braxton portrays her characters’ passions for drumming, books, love, and for building a vibrant and safe community via a bookstore and music/drum center. She also conveys the warmth, great food, culture and hopes of African immigrants, their patriarchal attitudes notwithstanding.

Her story also makes clear how her characters’ hopes and visions can get stymied by rampant capitalism disguised as “neighborhood development,” as well as by racial stereotyping that can be used by unscrupulous characters to get away with misdeeds.

On a more personal level, The Talking Drum explores themes of trust, loyalty, and painful apologies needed to make a marriage work, as well as parenting challenges. A young girl, despite her bursts of “acting out” rooted in domestic abuse she’d seen as a child, has the fierce support of her mother and a drumming teacher.

As a longtime Boston area resident, I remember how, in the 1960s, Harvard used racism – and motorcycle gangs, to scare renters (unsuccessfully) out of its Mission Hill properties, and how in the 1980s landlords deliberately set fires to collect insurance, and sell their lots to profiteers.

The Talking Drum is a compelling book. And given the mystery fires, the love affairs, the colorful characters, the drumming, and the urgent and timely issue of gentrification and how financial problems can twist people’s motives, I think it would also make a great movie.

 

 

My Staircase and the History and Hope it Holds

Posted on 01 November 2019 (0)